In modern system integration control, large-scale signal switching systems are indispensable in various places. At present, mainstream signal switching systems include CREATOR and other large-scale switching system products, including AV signal switching system, RGB signal switching system, and DVI. Signal switching system and HDMI signal switching system, etc. However, at present, the differences in various environments, especially the influence of peripheral electromagnetic interference, will have a certain degree of influence on various signal switching systems. Therefore, each manufacturer adopts EMI/EMC in its own signal switching system. Suppression and other technologies. Below, I will briefly introduce some related issues:
The type of product is different from the test organization, and the test requirements for EMI/EMC are also different. However, EMI/EMC testing can be roughly divided into two categories:
Radiation: This test limits the amplitude and frequency of a signal radiated or conducted by a product so that it does not interfere with other products.
Sensitivity (also known as immunity): This test illustrates the product's ability to suppress radiation by limiting the amplitude and frequency of radiated and conducted signals that interfere with proper operation of the device.
EMI/EMC test failures typically occur in the weakest part of the product design (signal and interference) from this link into or out of the shielded and filtered device. In the audio/video interface, the weakest point is the cable that connects the devices, which is equivalent to the antenna. For computers, the cable that connects the display and speakers to the computer is the weakest link, and it often causes EMI/EMC problems. We might think that only high-bandwidth video interfaces will cause this kind of problem, and low-frequency audio interfaces will not have this problem. This is true when all amplifiers use Class A audio amplifiers. However, the high-efficiency Class D amplifiers currently in use have high-frequency switching signals, and EMI problems can occur if proper filtering and shielding are not performed.
The video format commonly used by computers, which we call "graphics", is different from the video format of television. Computer video includes red, green, and blue (R, G, B) analog video signals, as well as line, field sync, and logic signals consisting of DDC5, all of which have fast rise/fall times. Video connectors typically use high-density ultra-micro D-type connectors for connecting monitors and computers. Although this solution combines video signal shielding (coaxial) and common mode choke (CMC) to reduce radiated and conducted EMI, it is necessary to add filtering to ensure EMI requirements are met. In broadcast video applications, similar filtering measures are employed to eliminate aliasing artifacts in television images. However, this cannot be done in graphics video because the purpose of graphics video is to reproduce the checkerboard pattern of "on" and "off" pixels at the highest possible resolution. Therefore, in order to achieve the best display performance, we hope that the larger the bandwidth, the better. However, in practical applications, EMI and video performance must be weighed, so video bandwidth is sacrificed. For multi-signal video interfaces, multiple factors need to be weighed.
The audio interface needs to solve a series of different problems to achieve efficiency and performance without generating EMI. In portable applications, we want to maximize battery life without expecting inefficient designs to generate heat, so Class D amplifiers are widely used. The problem is that Class D amplifiers use PWM for high efficiency, which is very similar to switching power supplies. When an unshielded speaker cable is used to connect to the output, the cable radiates EMI like an antenna. Although the clock frequency (typically 300kHz to 1MHz) is higher than the audio spectrum, it is a square wave with a large number of harmonic components. The filter used to filter out the harmonic components is relatively large in size and costly. In portable applications such as laptops, this is not a viable solution due to size.
Among the many EMI/EMC suppression technologies, the MAX9511 and MAX9705 represent advanced technologies for EMI/EMC control, and are gradually being applied to specific products. Applying these devices to the product can effectively reduce EMI. There is no need to rely on large external filters and shielding to increase cost and size as before, and these devices use today's most advanced technology to ensure electromagnetic compatibility and performance.
The main function of the MPPT Solar Controller is to realize maximum power point tracking (MPPT) in the solar power generation system to improve the energy utilization efficiency of solar panels. It is an advanced charge controller that can adjust the output voltage and current of the Solar Panel in real-time to keep the solar panel operating at the maximum power output point.
Main effect:
Maximum power point tracking: MPPT Solar Controller can accurately calculate the maximum power output point of the solar panel by monitoring the voltage and current of the solar panel in real-time and according to the characteristics of the solar panel. It then adjusts the panel's output voltage and current to keep it operating at its maximum power output point, maximizing the solar panel's energy conversion efficiency.
High energy utilization rate: MPPT Solar Controller's maximum power point tracking function can ensure that the solar panel is always operating in the best working condition, making full use of solar energy, thereby improving the energy utilization rate of the photovoltaic power generation system.
Charge control: In addition to achieving maximum power point tracking, MPPT Solar Controller also has a charge control function to protect the battery from overcharge and over-discharge damage.
Differences from other charge controllers:
Maximum power point tracking function: MPPT Solar Controller is a charge controller specially used in solar power generation systems. The biggest difference is that it has a maximum power point tracking function, which is used to improve the energy conversion efficiency of solar panels. Other charge controllers may not have this unique feature.
Energy efficiency: MPPT Solar Controller can improve the energy efficiency of solar panels through maximum power point tracking technology. Other charge controllers may only be able to charge in a fixed manner and cannot achieve maximum power point tracking.
Application scenarios: MPPT Solar Controller is mainly used in solar power generation systems, while other charge controllers may be suitable for different types of energy generation systems, such as wind power, hydropower, etc.
Overall, the main role of the MPPT Solar Controller is to achieve maximum power point tracking, improve the energy conversion efficiency of the solar panel, and protect the battery from overcharge and over-discharge damage. Compared with other charge controllers, it has unique advantages in energy utilization efficiency and maximum power point tracking and is suitable for applications in solar power generation systems.
10 amp mppt solar charge controller, solar charge controller 10 amp, 36v mppt solar charge controller, dc dc mppt charger, lithium ion solar charge controller
Ningbo Autrends International Trade Co., Ltd. , https://www.aitsolarpanels.com