"All electric cars are garbage." The 100,000+ article "Why do I say that electric cars are rubbish" was repeatedly relayed in WeChat's circle of friends, pricking the nerves of many people.
The reality among them is that in the first-tier cities in China, the reason why most people buy pure electric vehicles is because they are not shaken, so they have to choose electric vehicles. However, the power of electric vehicles in the market is not as good as that of fuel vehicles.
The author writes in the article: "After searching all the data, we could not find a pure electric vehicle that could meet both the conditions of "open and close" and "reliable quality." The main reason is that the price is more expensive than the fuel vehicle, and the interior is rough and rough and does not pay attention to safety.
He pointed out from the point of view of auto manufacturers that “at present, the emergence of pure electric vehicles in China is not for the sake of consumers. In most cases, these pure electric vehicles are purely a deceitful tool and are purely a nephew. Quality is not reliable and it is not important, it is important to be able to eat the dividends of the policy. This dividend, after eating a wave, does not intend to stay forever.
In order to quickly put into production, quickly introduced to the market, quickly defrauded a large number of subsidies, domestic pure electric vehicles basically took two paths, one for the standard version of the old era scooter, the second is an ordinary gasoline car directly converted.
Correspondingly, due to changes in the mechanical properties brought about by changes in the power system and changes in weight distribution, domestic pure electric vehicles simply do not bother to study. Active on the line. Therefore, these mass-produced and shoddy gadgets are terrible in terms of quality, experience, and value-preservation. To buy such a car is to buy a super expensive four-wheeled version of the battery car. â€
The author stated in the article that a 190,000 van, with a few exposed lithium iron phosphate batteries on the chassis, and then fitted with a motor, could sell 750,000.
How much the above statement states the current status of domestic electric vehicle development:
In other words, new energy vehicles are pursuing blow-out development under the promotion of policies, but the development foundation is still weak. From a product point of view, existing new energy vehicles are mostly based on the improvement of traditional fuel vehicles, and they lack the integrated products that come from electric vehicle platforms and electric vehicle design genes.
Some analysts said that society has a huge controversy over the development of new energy vehicles. This suspicion has also existed intermittently in the past few years. From the perspective of participants in new energy vehicles, there are only three perspectives: the country’s policy guidance, active participation of manufacturers, and consumer recognition and buy-in.
However, currently from the perspective of consumers, most electric vehicles on the market currently do not have product strength.
An electric car entrepreneur stated that the so-called environmental protection and economy are simply not selling points for electric vehicles at this stage. Domestic electric cars cannot be called "electric cars" but can only be called "policy cars." It is obviously in vain to not overhaul products and try to overtake them. The future of excellent electric vehicles must not come from existing OEMs. Emerging electric car makers have thrown away their burdens and have been killed. It is also possible that Tesla will be born.
This also shows that the current market demand for electric vehicles can not meet more consumers, and has become the crux of the problem: the current domestic auto manufacturers' products are not sincere enough.
If the consensus in the industry is that the future of new energy vehicles is a general trend, just as petrol vehicles replaced carriages 130 years ago, then, for the current status of electric vehicle products, should the author's "noise sound" be considered?
What is your opinion of the original author's point of view? Please click on the link to vote.
Related Reading:
Why do I say that electric cars are garbage
Original Qingyuan: Electric vehicles should not develop, how to develop?
This article is a new intellectual article and welcomes attention to new intellectual driving. Wechat add "New Driver" to subscribe to the public number.
